How to Check a Chinese Supplier's Litigation and Court Records

The most predictive information about a Chinese supplier is not its marketing but its litigation history. A company that is repeatedly sued for unpaid debts, or that has been listed as a 'dishonest debtor' for failing to pay judgments, is a much higher risk than one with a clean record — regardless of how polished its website is.

The official sources

• 中国裁判文书网 (China Judgements Online, wenshu.court.gov.cn) — published court judgments.
• 中国执行信息公开网 (China Enforcement Information Publicity, zxgk.court.gov.cn) — enforcement cases and the 'dishonest person subject to enforcement' blacklist.
• 中国审判流程信息公开网 and 失信被执行人 lists, also mirrored by commercial databases.

What to look for

Not all litigation is a red flag — a trading company involved in a few ordinary contract disputes is normal. Focus on the pattern:

• Is the company frequently a defendant in debt, loan, or product-quality cases?
• Does it appear as a 'dishonest debtor' (失信被执行人) — meaning it failed to comply with a court order to pay?
• Are there enforcement cases against it with unsatisfied amounts?
• Is it the subject of labor disputes in bulk (suggesting wage problems and an unstable workforce)?

Reading a judgment like a buyer

Judgments are public and often detailed. The case type, the amount in dispute, and the outcome tell you a lot. A supplier that repeatedly loses cases over non-delivery or defective goods is precisely the kind of counterparty you want to avoid. Commercial databases make this easier by aggregating case counts, roles (plaintiff vs. defendant), and amounts.

Because litigation data can lag by months, use it as one input among several. Combined with registry status, equity records, and live verification, it gives you a rounded picture of whether a supplier is worth the risk.

Related guides